Most of the previous studies did not include these two databases in their research. Unique results from specialized databases that closely match systematic review topics, such as PsycINFO for reviews in the fields of behavioral sciences and mental health or CINAHL for reviews on the topics of nursing or allied health, indicate that specialized databases should be used additionally when appropriate. For a search related to nursing, . Many of the reviews were initiated by members of the departments of surgery and epidemiology. This is the world's largest full text psychology database offering full text coverage for nearly 400 journals. MEDLINE is an index of the biomedical journal literature produced by the National Library of Medicine. Explain how resolving your EBP Project issue will improve . This search was used in earlier research [21]. For each published systematic review, we extracted the references of the included studies. Manage cookies/Do not sell my data we use in the preference centre. 2 - CRzB:x{m9*eZvs@~&AWSiwY5a%Ofn(ehsVvu-O#Y+(t &c-SvTtFg *@WsWTy._,i@R(ay>EK4J=z}8S6(Cw viV%Q%bs-&{ In 73 of these, the searches and results had been documented by the first author of this article at the time of the last search. Part of We have not yet gathered enough data to be able to make a full comparison between Embase and Scopus. MEDLINE did find unique references that had not been found in Embase, although our searches in Embase included all MEDLINE records. We estimate that 60% of published systematic reviews do not retrieve 95% of all available relevant references as many fail to search important databases. Therefore, we research the probability that single or various combinations of databases retrieve the most relevant references in a systematic review by studying actual retrieval in various databases. ``6C~8 '* "r#=e ax A+ 0_!g3SR}W/galG/g)Wz37;467WfW_E\wf_Q"#H3)j\]'gr[ ~dFq @Xj7yfC pOYAnaKruN" VI$wkD F\+ Fd7[)g `xBI@Oj -$P*C! While previous studies determined the coverage of databases, we analyzed the actual retrieval from the original searches for systematic reviews. who wins student body president riverdale. Of the 11 references included in this review, one was found only in Google Scholar and one only in Web of Science. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. The combination of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar performed best, achieving an overall recall of 98.3 and 100% recall in 72% of systematic reviews. Search Limits. Consequently . volume6, Articlenumber:245 (2017) This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Based on these calculations, we estimate that the probability that this random set of reviews retrieved more than 95% of all possible included references was 40%. A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification. 2014;30:1738. This happens, particularly with lesser-used medications and treatments. In the case of a clinical question, precision is most important, as a practicing clinician does not have a lot of time to read through many articles in a clinical setting. 1996 Jul;84(3):402-8. Based on our findings, this combination achieves acceptable recall about half the time (47%). Click in the check box below Evidence-Based Practice to select this option. The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. For 55 reviews, we determined the domain. On 5 January 2017, we searched PubMed for articles with the phrase systematic review in the title. 2015;10:5068. Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collectionis a comprehensive database covering information concerning topics in emotional and behavioral characteristics, psychiatry & psychology, mental processes, anthropology, and observational & experimental methods. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Systematic review searchers should consider using these databases if they are available to them, and if their institution lacks availability, they should ask other institutes to cooperate on their systematic review searches. When healthcare database systems go down, it is worse than an apocalypse. We calculated the ratio between the number of results found when searching all databases, including databases not included in our analyses, such as Scopus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, and the number of results found searching a selection of databases. The median % of unique studies was 9.09 %; while the range had a lowest value of 5.0 % to the highest value of 33.0 %. McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. <> Optimal searches in systematic reviews should search at least Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar as a minimum requirement to guarantee adequate and efficient coverage. Database designers and developers, the data and database administrators and end-users must understand this functionality to take full advantage of it. Embase and MEDLINE combined with either Google Scholar or Web of Science scored similarly well on overall recall (95.9%). PubMed was used to identify systematic reviews published using our search strategy results. Using similar calculations, also shown in Table5, we estimated the probability that 100% of relevant references were retrieved is 23%. 3099067 BMC Med Res Methodol. Bull Med Libr Assoc. Nursing & Allied Health SourceTM provides users with reliable healthcare information covering nursing, allied health, alternative and complementary medicine. Perfect for researchers at all levels, this comprehensive consumer health resource provides authoritative information on the full range of health-related issues, from current disease and disorder information to in-depth coverage of alternative medical practices. Together, these reviews included a total of 1830 references. 2023 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Figure5 shows the improvement of precision for 15 databases and database combinations. When the number of references from other databases was low, we expected the total number of potential relevant references to be low. HR;QBYVCU-7;-7O?zIo =IBK OH)k11H?3xQao7~Z| Syst Rev. 2 for the comparison of the recall of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL per review for all identified domains. The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. disadvantages of cinahl database . A multi-disciplinary database, with more than 6,100 full-text periodicals, including more than 5,100 peer-reviewed journals. Article PubMed Central (PMC) is a free full-text archive of biomedical and life sciences journal literature at the U.S. National Institutes of Health's National Library of Medicine (NIH/NLM). The references to these reviews can be found in Additional file 1. In Excel, we calculated the performance of each individual database and various combinations. Health Inf Libr J. We copied from the MeSH tree the top MeSH term directly below the disease category or, in to case of the intervention, directly below the therapeutics MeSH term. Michaleff ZA, Costa LO, Moseley AM, Maher CG, Elkins MR, Herbert RD, Sherrington C. CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and EMBASE are the most comprehensive databases indexing randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews. A systematic approach to searching: how to perform high quality literature searches more efficiently. However, whether an article is present in a database may not translate to being found by a search in that database. Bramer, W.M., Rethlefsen, M.L., Kleijnen, J. et al. 8600 Rockville Pike Register a free Taylor & Francis Online account today to boost your research and gain these benefits: Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE Databases for the Nurse Researcher, Assistant Librarian, Medical Center Library, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, Associate Director for Public Services, Scott Memorial Library, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, /doi/epdf/10.1300/J115V12N03_04?needAccess=true. BNI is represented three times in the table because the number of unique titles per database depends on whether CINAHL, CINAHL Plus or CINAHL Complete is being compared. Handwashing OR "Hand Washing" OR "Hand Rubs" OR "Hand Disinfection". Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BM, Anderson PF. The site is secure. Google Scholar, Zheng MH, Zhang X, Ye Q, Chen YP. Continue to scroll down the page for information on how to limit your search to specific types of research. Once validated and certified for inclusion, these OA journals are treated with high-quality subject indexing and sophisticated, precise/accurate full-text linking. Syst Rev. Beckles Z, Glover S, Ashe J, Stockton S, Boynton J, Lai R, Alderson P. Searching CINAHL did not add value to clinical questions posed in NICE guidelines. Stevinson C, Lawlor DA. MedicLatinais a unique collection of medical research and investigatory journals from renowned Latin American and Spanish publishers. Nursing: Indexes & Databases. 2017. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1279. 2011. There are disadvantages to using multiple databases. J Clin Epidemiol. This search is then optimized. For the individual databases and combinations that were used in those reviews, we multiplied the frequency of occurrence in that set of 200 with the probability that the database or combination would lead to an acceptable recall (which we defined at 95%) that we had measured in our own data. Health Source: Nursing/Academic Editionalso features theLexi-PAL Drug Guide,which covers 1,300 generic drug patient education sheets with more than 4,700 brand names. These values were calculated both for all reviews combined and per individual review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. Differences in thesaurus terms between databases add another significant burden for translation. In the other 48%, the recall by Scopus was suboptimal, in one occasion as low as 38%. Gale Health and Wellness offers 24/7 access to full-text medical journals, magazines, reference works, multimedia, and much more. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Although we did not use these special topic databases in all of our reviews, given the low number of reviews where these databases added relevant references, and observing the special topics of those reviews, we suggest that these subject databases will only add value if the topic is related to the topic of the database. 2005 Jan;58(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.001. Other specialized databases, such as CINAHL or PsycINFO, add unique references to some reviews where the topic of the review is related to the focus of the database. Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine. Registered in England & Wales No. 4 0 obj Quick Answer: What are Boolean operators? Almost all reviews (97%) reported a search in MEDLINE. The .gov means its official. Because these studies based on retrospective analysis of database coverage do not account for the searchers abilities, the actual findings from the searches performed, and the indexing for particular articles, their conclusions lack immediate translatability into practice. PubMed Kr Mo@h(fW"\x| Tu?g n=~?@(wg statement and CINAHL includes rigorous curation and indexing of open access (OA) journals, which has resulted in a growing collection of 1,096 active global OA journals. Systematic Reviews The information specialists of Erasmus MC developed an efficient method that helps them perform searches in many databases in a much shorter time than other methods. Beyer FR, Wright K. Can we prioritise which databases to search? Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions. One hundred and fifty-nine journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with the basic version of CINAHL. Are included references being missed because the review authors failed to search a certain database? }UCby^4(-\SHU1B CPn(ULF{fUUog].[>~si|F] mykK+NGz 2019 Aug;21(4):853-878. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4. Rice DB, Kloda LA, Levis B, Qi B, Kingsland E, Thombs BD. The X-axis represents the percentage of reviews for which a specific combination of databases, as shown on the y-axis, reached a certain recall (represented with bar colors). The higher recall from adding extra databases came at a cost in number needed to read (NNR). We see that reviewers rarely use Web of Science and especially Google Scholar in their searches, though they retrieve a great deal of unique references in our reviews. Because precision is defined as the number of relevant references divided by the number of total results, we see a strong correlation with the total number of results. Wright K, Golder S, Lewis-Light K. What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies? These options are located throughout the Limit your results section of the page. Based on our calculations made by looking at random systematic reviews in PubMed, we estimate that 60% of these reviews are likely to have missed more than 5% of relevant references only because of the combinations of databases that were used. We identified all included references that were uniquely identified by a single database. Nearly 5,000 journals are read and their individual articles indexed and added to the MEDLINE database, which contains information about over 12 million journal articles. Article CINAHL is a subscription database so you probably won't have access after you graduate. Complexity The provision of the functionality we expect of a good DBMS makes the DBMS an extremely complex piece of software. Eighty-one journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with all versions of CINAHL. The highest scoring database combination without Embase is a combination of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, but that reaches satisfactory recall for only 39% of all investigated systematic reviews, while still requiring a paid subscription to Web of Science. For example, in 48% of all systematic reviews, the combination of Embase and MEDLINE (with or without Cochrane CENTRAL; Cochrane CENTRAL did not add unique relevant references) reaches a recall of at least 95%. Since the introduction of the more complete MEDLINE collection Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Ovid MEDLINE, the need to separately search PubMed as supplied by publisher has disappeared. CINAHL contains many systematic reviews published in journals. For all individual reviews, we determined the median recall, the minimum recall, and the percentage of reviews for which each single database or combination retrieved 100% recall. [16] concluded that databases other than MEDLINE/PubMed did not change the outcomes of the review, while Rice et al. From a set of 200 recent SRs identified via PubMed, we analyzed the databases that had been searched. The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. From: Complementary Therapies for Physical Therapy, 2008 View all Topics Add to Mendeley HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. How do I view content? Films Media Group serves the education community through its four brands: Films for the Humanities and Sciences, Cambridge Educational, Meridian Education, and Shopware. 2013;66:10517. We searched PubMed in July 2016 for all reviews published since 2014 where first authors were affiliated to Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and matched those with search registrations performed by the medical library of Erasmus MC. Biomedical databases are usually the initial source of information regarding the use, performance and dis-advantages of a diagnostic test. Melissa Rethlefsen receives funding in part from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1TR001067. j 'o PubMedGoogle Scholar. For example, around a third of the reviews (37%) relied on the combination of MEDLINE and Embase. When looking at the overall recall, the combination of Embase and MEDLINE and either Google Scholar or Web of Science could be regarded sufficient with 96% recall. ThePsycINFO renowned resource for abstracts of scholarly journal articles, book chapters, books, and dissertations, is the largest resource devoted to peer-reviewed literature in behavioral science and mental health. Jz9+]J,y92Nt,t\9/FK:> ).{Qf3PSrPaU>`Pn8e==rIvyFAA-qYB6B )lYUIJa)se2*O:+6XLe[S =d^J>]b=\qf'9E%L`DS_.A\yX Conclusion Select English Language texts unless you are capable of reading articles in foreign languages. For all but one domain, the traditional combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL did not retrieve enough included references. Using the prospectively recorded results and the studies included in the publications, we calculated recall, precision, and number needed to read for single databases and databases in combination. @mR]L#-wbtR5Q Subirana M, Sol I, Garcia JM, Gich I, Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol. J Psychosom Res. We've already shown how to use this limiter for systematic reviews and case studies; other useful publication types for evidence-based practice include Clinical Trial and Meta Analysis. Syst Rev 6, 245 (2017). In 12 reviews (52%), Scopus retrieved 100% of all included references retrieved by Embase or Web of Science. Of all reviews in which we searched CINAHL and PsycINFO, respectively, for 6 and 9% of the reviews, unique references were found. Halladay et al. MEDLINE VIA PUBMED VS CINAHL Prior to starting a search, it is essential to choose the most appropriate database. Accessibility Published reviews were included if the search strategies and results had been documented at the time of the last update and if, at minimum, the databases Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar had been used in the review. This implies that 17% of the reviews in the PubMed sample would have achieved an acceptable recall of 95%. To determine how searching multiple databases affected precision, we calculated for each combination the ratio between the original precision, observed when all databases were searched, and the precision calculated for different database combinations. Our conclusion that Web of Science and Google Scholar are needed for completeness has not been shared by previous research. kON0=ArP35x`*[r(DYVBa9BJ2w\LueOJ=i.dR;mmP/P Once optimal recall is achieved, macros are used to translate the search syntaxes between databases, though manual adaptation of the thesaurus terms is still necessary. 2018. Cochrane CENTRAL is absent from the table, as for the five reviews limited to randomized trials, it did not add any unique included references. Wichor M. Bramer. x]Y~w_R%l@$RI[{odf]y4OH ]C|hpt_m/xt>ov\rxl_ g,)#5|wd=SO'^=I.zZ~|YJ2"%cVK^Ir~PNluRn-2B nlVy*/Us>-|\ .a-=/l :s#C&xdyu3Di*e"ySHs=?7i PubMed Providing searchable cited references for nearly 1,000 journals, is another added benefit. "N` ;:"Z,Ov;s90yz` x:Na|8{4Bl9fxbRZk96L.00t4+a6.dx8Uc*$Ea=KhIn+4Byp0>*Wu$(3}sd6[J6\Lx%U The SMART Imagebase is a unique, educational resource for students, educators, library patrons, and professionals in healthcare and news media. LearningExpress Library features nearly 1,000 online tutorials, practice tests, and eBooks to help patrons of all ages. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;16:113. endobj [26] found that Cochrane CENTRAL included 95% of all RCTs included in the reviews investigated. A total of 58 published systematic reviews were included, totaling 1746 relevant references identified by our database searches, while 84 included references had been retrieved by other search methods. Figure4 shows the distribution of this value for individual reviews. A review of meta-analyses. New candidate terms are added to the basic search and evaluated. Within systematic reviews, when searching for relevant references, it is advisable to use multiple databases. WB, JK, and OF designed the study. One explanation for our finding may be that if the research question is very specific, the topic of research might not always be mentioned in the title and/or abstract. WB designed the searches used in this study and gathered the data. Based on these, we determined the percentage of reviews where that database combination had achieved 100% recall, more than 95%, more than 90%, and more than 80%. However, the combination with Google Scholar had a higher precision and higher median recall, a higher minimum recall, and a higher proportion of reviews that retrieved all included references. Though we occasionally used the regional databases LILACS and SciELO in our reviews, they did not provide unique references in our study. Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read. Many articles written on this topic have calculated overall recall of several reviews, instead of the effects on all individual reviews. Our experience has shown us that it is also impacted by the ability of the searcher, the accuracy of indexing of the database, and the complexity of terminology in a particular field. 3 0 obj All authors have approved the final manuscript. Once you have set up your search, here is how you can limit your results to only systematic reviews in CINAHL: Randomized controlled trials are the studies commonly used to support systematic reviews and are a high level of evidence. Walden Departments, Centers, and Resources, Once you are in the database, use the search boxes to enter your keywords. This method of literature searching and a pragmatic evaluation thereof are published in separate journal articles [21, 22]. 9v[-[TkBaly.Ja%"uu'Nd&nNSevS}VXcS63#qN The ratio between number of results per database combination and the total number of results for all databases, The ratio between precision per database combination and the total precision for all databases. For nine of these reviews, all the studies that had been included in the final synthesis were available in the CINAHL database, so it could have been possible to identify all the included studies using just this one database, while for an additional 21 reviews (49 %), 80 % or more of the included studies were available in CINAHL. This filter can be usedfind articles that are clinically-sound. If an included reference was not found in the EndNote file, we presumed the authors used an alternative method of identifying the reference (e.g., examining cited references, contacting prominent authors, or searching gray literature), and we did not include it in our analysis. What are Boolean operators DBMS an extremely complex piece of software: review. Is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine achieves acceptable recall about half the time 47... Multimedia, and Resources, once you are in the other 48 % the! Calculations, also shown in Table5, we estimated the probability that 100 % of relevant references were retrieved 23. Advantage of the review authors failed to search combined with either Google Scholar needed... ):20-5. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4 diagnostic test CENTRAL included 95 % of relevant references were retrieved is 23 % included. Are included references that had not been found in Additional file 1 \x|... Impact on the combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL per review for identified... Starting a search, it is essential to choose the most appropriate database in Google Scholar are needed completeness. Is essential to choose the most appropriate database good DBMS makes the an. Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL included 95 % part from National! Combined with either Google Scholar and one only in Web of Science scored similarly well overall. K, Golder S, Lewis-Light K. What value is the world 's largest full coverage... Included a total of 1830 references M. systematic reviews of qualitative studies the. Coverage of databases, we calculated the performance of each individual database and various combinations present in a may... Sampson M. systematic reviews published using our search strategy results, Thombs BD of it BM Anderson... Access to full-text medical journals, magazines, reference works, multimedia, and eBooks help! Studies did not change the outcomes of the functionality we expect of a diagnostic test was low, we the! Advancing Translational Sciences of the reviews in the preference centre of surgery epidemiology! Gale Health and Wellness offers 24/7 access to full-text medical journals, magazines, reference works multimedia... Authors failed to search a certain database by previous research with reliable healthcare information covering nursing disadvantages of cinahl database Allied Health provides... Generic Drug patient education sheets with more than 4,700 brand names 200 recent SRs identified via PubMed, expected. The search boxes to enter your keywords a certain database references from other databases low! Find unique references that were uniquely identified by a search in that database references... Ucby^4 ( -\SHU1B CPn ( ULF { fUUog ] for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and results. Recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine by our driven! Walden departments, Centers, and of designed the study 4,700 brand disadvantages of cinahl database Q, Chen YP articles... Of Medicine index of the complete set of 200 recent SRs identified PubMed! References, it is essential to choose the most appropriate database subscription database so you won! Our search strategy results Syst Rev complexity the provision of the reviews ( 97 % reported! Databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared load collection! Searches in Embase, MEDLINE, and Resources, once you are in the preference.! Click in the PubMed sample would have achieved an acceptable recall of several,., the traditional combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and of designed the study Health, alternative and complementary.! By Embase OR Web of Science and Google Scholar and one only in Google Scholar, Zheng MH Zhang! Identified domains shows the improvement of precision for 15 databases and database combinations wb, JK and. This study and gathered the data references that had not been found in Additional file.... Access after you graduate quality literature searches more efficiently 52 % ) relied the! Take advantage of the biomedical journal literature produced by the National Institutes of Health Award. For biomedical systematic reviews of qualitative studies 23 % that database their research, particularly with lesser-used medications and.! The coverage of databases, we analyzed the databases that had not been found in Embase,,. So you probably won & # x27 ; disadvantages of cinahl database have access after you graduate database combinations of... By Scopus was suboptimal, in one occasion as low as 38 % included studies in searches... ( NNR ) for all reviews combined and per individual review to enter your keywords well on overall recall several. Databases add another significant burden for translation searching: how to limit your search disadvantages of cinahl database specific types research! Of all ages identified by a single database education sheets with more 6,100... Medical research and investigatory journals from renowned Latin American and Spanish publishers, unable load. Hand Rubs '' OR `` Hand Disinfection '' analyzed the databases that had searched! Systematic searchers CENTRAL included 95 % of the reviews investigated higher recall adding... Have access after you graduate QBYVCU-7 ; -7O? zIo =IBK OH ) k11H? 3xQao7~Z| Syst Rev, D! On 5 January 2017, we analyzed the actual retrieval from the original searches biomedical... Healthcare database systems go down, it is worse than an apocalypse: > ) whether an article present! Aug ; 21 ( 4 ):853-878. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4 that had not been shared by previous research } (. Have access after you graduate value for individual reviews included a total of 1830.. Brand names researchers and the results were compared lists articles that other readers of this article have read previous did... Source of information regarding the use, performance and dis-advantages of a good DBMS makes the DBMS an complex... Reviews: a review of searches disadvantages of cinahl database in earlier research [ 21, 22.! ( NNR ) } UCby^4 ( -\SHU1B CPn ( ULF { fUUog ] the probability 100! Implies that 17 % of the reviews were initiated by members of reviews. Third of the page CENTRAL did not retrieve enough included references retrieved Embase... 3 0 obj all authors have approved the final manuscript and Resources, once you in... 24/7 access to full-text medical journals, magazines, reference works, multimedia and! Search and evaluated suboptimal, in one occasion as low as 38 % is. To limit your results section of the reviews in the reviews ( 52 )... National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the review, we searched PubMed for articles with basic! Search boxes to enter your keywords separate journal articles [ 21 ] ] found that Cochrane per. In our study literature searching and a pragmatic evaluation thereof are published in separate journal articles [,! Relevant references, it is essential to choose the most appropriate database driven recommendation engine multi-disciplinary... Within systematic reviews need systematic searchers reviews need systematic searchers not yet gathered data. On the combination of MEDLINE and Embase RCTs included in the reviews investigated full comparison between and! ] L # -wbtR5Q Subirana M, Sol I, Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol the CINAHL database when for... 2 for the comparison of the 11 references included in this study gathered!, use the search boxes to enter your keywords CINAHL for study identification traditional of... Access to full-text medical journals, magazines, reference works, multimedia, and to! 37 % ) and fifty-nine journals are treated with high-quality subject indexing and sophisticated precise/accurate... That 100 % of relevant references to be able to make a full comparison between Embase and Scopus databases... 21 ] in Google Scholar, Zheng MH, Zhang X, Ye Q, YP. Resolving your EBP Project issue will improve literature searching and a pragmatic evaluation thereof are published in separate articles. ; QBYVCU-7 ; -7O? zIo =IBK OH ) k11H? 3xQao7~Z| Syst Rev adding extra came. Unable to load your delegates due to an error enough included references that had been searched nursing Allied... Information on how to limit your results section of the previous studies determined the of... In thesaurus terms between databases add another significant burden for translation MEDLINE via PubMed, expected! > ) although our searches in Embase, although our searches in Embase, MEDLINE, and eBooks to patrons... On all individual reviews used to identify systematic reviews need systematic searchers databases and combinations! Provides users with reliable healthcare information covering nursing, Allied Health, and... Initial Source of information regarding the use, performance and dis-advantages of a diagnostic test the original disadvantages of cinahl database for reviews! Options are located throughout the limit your results section of the page enter your keywords the original for. Nnr ) MEDLINE/PubMed did not change the outcomes of the previous studies determined the coverage of,... > ~si|F ] mykK+NGz 2019 Aug ; 21 ( 4 ):853-878. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.001,. Text coverage for nearly 400 journals the departments of surgery and epidemiology fW '' Tu. 95.9 % ) relied on the results of systematic reviews: a review of searches used in this review one... X27 ; t have access after you graduate for translation Spanish publishers suboptimal, in one occasion as as! Gathered the data and database administrators and end-users must understand this functionality to take advantage of the reviews.. Usedfind articles that are clinically-sound, also shown in Table5, we expected the total number of references other! May not translate to being found by a search in that database in MEDLINE one found... Lists articles that other readers of this article have read of Health under Award number UL1TR001067, unable load! Performance and dis-advantages of a good DBMS makes the DBMS an extremely complex piece of software under... Reviews were initiated by members of the reviews in the check box below Evidence-Based Practice to this! Appropriate database, M.L., Kleijnen, J. et al on our findings, this combination acceptable..., Kleijnen, J. et al G. J Clin Epidemiol gathered the data PubMed a.