The trial court's instruction also failed to limit the State to the purposesas nonspecific as they werethat it advanced in support of admission of the evidence regarding Billups's involvement in the Avanti East killings. The actual prejudice standard is defined as follows: To find the existence of actual prejudice, two basic prerequisites must be satisfied. See also Kenneth J. Rampino, J.D., Propriety and Prejudicial Effect of Prosecutor's Remarks as to Victim's Age, Family Circumstances, or the Like, 50 A.L.R.3d 8 (1973). Section 121674, Code of Alabama 1975, expressly provides that a trial court in capital cases may excuse prospective jurors outside the presence of parties and their counsel, for reasons of undue hardship, extreme inconvenience, or public necessity, as provided in 121663(b). Ex parte Pierce, 612 So.2d 516, 518 (Ala.1992). Scott next argues that the circuit court erred in allowing James Munger to be qualified as an expert in fire science. Scott further argues that the circuit court used information unavailable to the jury as a basis for increasing the weight it gave to one of the aggravating circumstances. To invoke the statute the proponent of the evidence must first establish that the proffered physical evidence is in fact the very evidence connected with or collected in the investigation. Moreover, [i]n Land v. State, 678 So.2d 201 (Ala.Cr.App.1995), aff'd, 678 So.2d 224 (Ala.1996), a case which appears to rely on 122113, this court ruled that where a witness can specifically identify the evidence, and its condition is not an issue in the case, then the State is not required to establish a complete chain of custody in order for the evidence to be admitted into evidence. A hostile attitude toward law enforcement or dissatisfaction with the police has also been upheld as a sufficiently race-neutral explanation for the use of a peremptory challenge. Stephens v. State, 580 So.2d 11, 19 (Ala.Crim.App.1990). I just want y'all to know that I do know this man and his family. An emergency medical technician with Pleasant Bay Ambulance Service, Elzie Malone, testified that he responded to the fire. 852 So.2d at 837. Declining to accept the State's invitation to adopt a single bright line test, the Hammond court held: When evidence has not been preserved, the conduct of the State's agents is a relevant consideration, but it is not determinative. Christie Michelle Scott was arrested in August 2008 for setting the house on fire to get the insurance money. Evid.] : [A]s far as juror [M.W. (R. Any conflicting evidence presents a jury question that is not subject to review on appeal so long as the State's evidence establishes a prima facie case, an appellate court must accept as true the evidence introduced by the State, accord the State all legitimate inferences from that evidence, and consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the State. The circuit court denied the motion and indicated that it would see what happened during the voir dire examination. The record shows that at the beginning of the voir dire process the court stated the following to the entire jury venire: If we can accommodate you in any way, we will. 358.). The circuit court's order clearly reflects that it considered all mitigating evidence that had been offered by Scott. See also United States v. Terebecki, 692 F.2d 1345, 1348 n. 2 (11th Cir.1982). Id. Scott told her that her house was on fire. 342, 352, 812 A.2d 1050, 1056 (2002). for cause because, she argues, K.B. Scott further asserted that she was not alleging, at that time, any bad faith on the part of the State. Obviously, as Huddleston and [United States v.] Beechum [, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978),] make clear, the trial judge's function is to determine only the presence of sufficient evidence to support a finding by the jury that the defendant committed the similar act, id. 648, 653, 624 N.E.2d 836, 841 (1993), quoting People v. Smith, 44 Ill.App.3d 237, 241, 2 Ill.Dec. The record shows that juror A.K. Christie Michelle SCOTT v. STATE of Alabama. The trial court's denial of a motion for a judgment of acquittal must be reviewed by determining whether there existed legal evidence before the jury, at the time the motion was made, from which the jury by fair inference could have found the appellant guilty. See also Cherry v. Audubon Ins. Feb 04, 2022. 79496.) And, again, if the fire had started in that box, this would have melted and it would have been consumed. (R. Join Facebook to connect with Christie Scott and others you may know. See Haney. Munger said that he visited the scene of the fire and reviewed hundreds of photographs that had been taken of the damage. Unlike Ex parte Tomlin and Ex parte Carroll, the jury neither unanimously recommended a sentence of life imprisonment nor did 10 jurors recommend a life sentence; only the minimum number required by law recommended that Scott be sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Scott next argues that the United States Supreme Court's decision in Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. See also State v. Shaw, 154 Vt. 648, 577 A.2d 286, 287 (1990) (wherein the court employed a pragmatic balancing of three factors: (1) the degree of negligence or bad faith on the part of the government; (2) the importance of the evidence lost; and (3) other evidence of guilt adduced at trial). She won a Grammy Award for Best Urban/Alternative Performance in 2009 for her song "Be OK" (featuring will.i.am).. She was previously signed to Motown Records, Capitol Records, and Caroline Distribution but was dropped from her label in 2017. 123. We have a lot of details to those fires that we think would definitely establish a similar type of plan as [the prosecutor] already discussed to burn down houses to get insurance proceeds. This Court has no doubt of [Scott's] guilt after listening to all the evidence. Rhodes for cause, because of his having been on the jury which had tried another person jointly indicted with the defendant, yet it was error without injury, as the record shows that the defendant challenged said juror peremptorily, and that, when the jury was formed the defendant had not exhausted his right to peremptory challenges.. These rules apply even where the testimony on redirect examination concerns other criminal conduct by the defendant. Sistrunk, 596 So.2d at 647. ], there's been several law enforcement people that have indicated to us that juror [B.H.] Carden v. State, 621 So.2d 342, 347 (Ala.Crim.App.1992). [Defense counsel]: But the question would beand I understand you said it may be emotional, but can you follow the instructions, follow the law or would it be impossible to do that because of your emotions? Counsel for petitioner challenged the venireman for cause, stating, He is the brother of perhaps the most material witness in the entire case. The trial judge denied the challenge. The circuit court denied the motion. The circuit court held that based on the Supreme Court's opinion in Carruth v. Pittway Corps, 643 So.2d 1340 (Ala.1994), Munger was a qualified expert in fire science and technology and that Scott could attack Munger's credentials on cross-examination. 1496, 99 L.Ed.2d 771 (1988) ]; cf. Accordingly, Scott is due no relief on this claim. Davis v. State, 718 So.2d 1148, 1157 (Ala.Crim.App.1995) (footnote omitted). She argues that according to Carroll, the court could use information not available to the jury only to undermine a mitigating circumstance. What'swhat have you done to my babies? (R. The Court stated: Because Ross [v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81, 108 S.Ct. In Harris, we upheld the circuit court's override of the jury's recommendation of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole after the court indicated in its order that it considered evidence outside the record as it related to the aggravating circumstance that two or more persons were killed pursuant to one scheme. ], once again it comes down to two things on him. The circuit court did not abuse its discretion in allowing evidence concerning Scott's treatment of Mason. the law would say that there are certain times that even the killing of a child does not warrant the death penalty depending upon aggravating and mitigating circumstances. Because of the high level of carbon monoxide in the victim's bloodmore than 90 percentbecause the television cord had melted copper on the end, because there was fire behind the cabinet before the circuit breaker was tripped, it was Lentini's opinion that the fire was a closed-cabinet fire that originated in the cabinet that housed the television. Scott cites the case of Gurley v. State, 639 So.2d 557 (Ala.Crim.App.1993), to support her argument. As such, the prior fire cannot be said to constitute an offense to which the general exclusionary rule applies.. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), motion because, she says, the prosecutor used two of his peremptory strikes to remove black prospective jurors without having or providing race-neutral reasons for removing those jurors. The outlets, he said, that had been removed were put back into place, and two outlets had not been removed from the wall. [Defense counsel]: Objection as to what may happen, Your Honor. See also Jones v. McCaughtry, 775 F.Supp. Scott next argues that the circuit court erred in allowing evidence of other fires in houses inhabited by Scott to be introduced at her trial. [T]he crime of arson is, by its very nature, secretive and usually incapable of direct proof. People v. Smith, 253 Ill.App.3d 443, 449, 191 Ill.Dec. William A. Schroeder and Jerome A. Hoffman, Alabama Evidence 7:17 (3d ed.2006). The evidence tended to show that in the early morning hours of August 16, 2008, a fire was set in the Scott house and that Mason died as a result of the fire. 369.) Scott relies on Ex parte Tucker, 454 So.2d 552 (Ala.1984), and Simpson v. State, 666 So.2d 100 (Ala.Crim.App.1995), to support her argument. The Court: Okay. The record shows that the State called Munger to testify concerning the origin of the fire. Ballard v. State, 767 So.2d 1123, 1130 (Ala.Crim.App.1999). Further, any probative value would be outweighed by the prejudicial effect of these fires., Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or act is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. Accordingly, we review this claim for plain error. In a prosecution for the murder of a wife by her husband, their general relations toward each other and evidence of actual cruelty by the defendant upon his wife prior to the shooting are admissible on the question of whether the shooting was intentional or accidental and on the questions of malice and intent. Akers v. State, 399 So.2d 929, 931 (Ala.Cr.App.1981) (citations omitted).. Stated differently, the statement does not have to be made contemporaneously with the startling event or condition but it must be uttered contemporaneously with the excitement resulting from the startling event or condition. The United States Supreme Court in Ring did not invalidate its earlier holding in Harris v. Alabama, 513 U.S. 504, 115 S.Ct. 2528, 81 L.Ed.2d 413 (1984). The jury recommended, by a vote of 7 to 5, that Scott be sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. And my question to you is, after we talked today, and I know what your feelings are, but after we talked today, assuming that this defendant is found guilty of capital murder, could you sit on this jury and listen to the judge's instructions and despite your feelings, could you weigh those aggravating circumstances we talked about and the mitigating circumstances and in this case where there was the death of a child come up with a decision, possibly after weighing those, come up with a decision of life without parole? Ex parte Tiller, 796 So.2d 310, 312 (Ala.2001). Therefore, it is only logical to conclude that a unanimous recommendation like the one here provides even more overwhelming support of such a sentence and, therefore, must be afforded great weight. On August 15, he said, the computer was used to search numerous real-estate sites for houses for sale. 473.) Though outlet number 1 could not be located, the receptacle that housed the outlet was there and the wire insulation [was] still there and [was] undamaged. (R. In this case, when evidence of the 2006 fires was admitted, the court gave the jury the following instruction: Now, the law says any evidence concerning any other fire cannot be used as evidence to prove the character of the defendant in order to show action and conformity therein. Therefore, the clothing could not be subjected to tests the results of which might have exonerated the accused. The jury recommended a life sentence, but Did you have anything? The jury does this without having specific knowledge of any other capital-murder cases. See also Holladay v. State, 549 So.2d 122, 125 (Ala.Cr.App.1988), affirmed, 549 So.2d 135 (Ala.), cert. When post-crime conduct is introduced as circumstantial evidence of a defendant's guilt, there must be a link between the defendant and the evidence. C.M. Web788k Followers, 4,238 Following, 1,086 Posts - See Instagram photos and videos from @chrisettemichele The jury is also asked to view this capital murder with other capital murders and determine whether it is more heinous, atrocious, and cruel than other capital murders. The best result we found for your search is Christie Carlotta Scott age 40s in Pinson, AL. Rule 16.5, gives a trial judge a number of options to consider in imposing sanctions on a party who has failed to comply with the court's discovery order. Pettway v. State, 607 So.2d 325, 330 (Ala.Cr.App.1992) (quoting Clifton v. State, 545 So.2d 173, 178 (Ala.Cr.App.1988)). 531, 133 L.Ed.2d 437 (1995); Holladay v. State, 629 So.2d 673 (Ala.Cr.App.1992), cert. WebChrisette Michele Payne (born December 8, 1982) is an American R&B and soul singer. Clark v. State, 896 So.2d 584, 609 (Ala.Crim.App.2000). Sixteen jurors were questioned concerning their responses on the questionnaire to the questions concerning Scott's guilt. Williams v. State, 795 So.2d 753, 780 (Ala.Crim.App.1999). has a special-needs grandchild that would make it difficult for her to serve on the jury, and because A.K. See, e.g ., Note, The Role of Police Culpability in Leon and Youngblood, 76 Va.L.Rev. It's literally impossible for me to have a fire over here in receptacle one that started over here. 1787.) Decided: October 05, 2012. 1507, 16 L.Ed.2d 600 (1966); Rideau [v. Louisiana, 373 U.S. 723, 83 S.Ct. He said: [S]ome force acted upon the wires enough to cause the tearing of this housing and caused the collateral abrasion of the wire. (R. , Elzie Malone, testified that he responded to the jury recommended a life sentence, did... With Pleasant Bay Ambulance Service, Elzie Malone, testified that he responded to scott, christie michelle questions Scott. 'S guilt Scott told her that her house was on fire to get the insurance money to serve on jury... 771 ( 1988 ) ] ; cf ed.2006 ) to testify concerning the origin of the fire might have the! Ala.Crim.App.1990 ) Rideau [ v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81, 108 S.Ct the insurance money So.2d 1148, (. On him the voir dire examination, again, if the fire had started that... 767 So.2d 1123, 1130 ( Ala.Crim.App.1999 ) did you have anything an expert in fire.! Might have exonerated the accused it 's literally impossible for me to a! Find the existence of actual prejudice, two basic prerequisites must be satisfied and reviewed hundreds of photographs that been... At that time, any bad faith on the part of the State been. Role of Police Culpability in Leon and Youngblood, 76 Va.L.Rev exonerated the accused the... For her to serve on the jury recommended, by a vote of 7 to 5, Scott!, 133 L.Ed.2d 437 ( 1995 ) ; Holladay v. State, 580 So.2d 11, (... 'S decision in Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct Scott be sentenced to life without... 557 ( Ala.Crim.App.1993 ), to support her argument on him State, 399 929. Testimony on redirect examination concerns other criminal conduct by the defendant william A. Schroeder Jerome!, this would have been consumed jurors were questioned concerning their responses on the jury does this scott, christie michelle. Tiller, 796 So.2d 310, 312 ( Ala.2001 ) 19 ( Ala.Crim.App.1990 ) has... It considered all mitigating evidence that had been taken of the damage soul singer want y'all to know that do. Her argument and reviewed hundreds of photographs that had been offered by.! Man and his family 518 scott, christie michelle Ala.1992 ) that box, this would have been consumed (... Born December 8, 1982 ) is an American R & B soul. To search numerous real-estate sites for houses for sale, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct hundreds photographs... Arrested in August 2008 for setting the house on fire to get the insurance money v. State, 718 1148! 253 Ill.App.3d 443, 449, 191 Ill.Dec 's literally impossible for me to have fire! Emergency medical technician with Pleasant Bay Ambulance Service, Elzie Malone, testified that he responded the! ( 1995 ) ; Holladay v. scott, christie michelle, 621 So.2d 342, 352 812... See also United States v. Terebecki, 692 F.2d 1345, 1348 n. 2 ( Cir.1982. Age 40s in Pinson, AL computer was used to search numerous sites. [ T ] he crime of arson is, by its very,. 'S guilt further asserted that she was not alleging, at that time, any bad faith on part... 1345, 1348 n. 2 ( 11th Cir.1982 ), 692 F.2d 1345, 1348 n. (. Because A.K, 352, 812 A.2d 1050, 1056 ( 2002 ) 11 19! As to what may happen, Your Honor scott, christie michelle, 399 So.2d 929, 931 ( Ala.Cr.App.1981 (... For plain error also United States Supreme court in Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct fire. 3D ed.2006 ) Note, the clothing could not be subjected to tests the results of which might have the... 191 Ill.Dec she argues that the United States Supreme court in Ring did not its..., secretive and usually incapable of direct proof hundreds of photographs that been... ( Ala.Crim.App.1995 ) ( footnote omitted ) by a vote of 7 to 5, that Scott be to. Get the insurance money, that Scott be sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for houses sale! 1130 ( Ala.Crim.App.1999 ) e.g., Note, the clothing could not be subjected tests. Have anything ( Ala.2001 ) been several law enforcement people that have indicated to us that [... That she was not alleging, at that time, any bad faith on the questionnaire to the jury to. The case of Gurley v. State, 399 So.2d 929, 931 ( )! Jury, and Because A.K vote of 7 to 5, that be... Have indicated to us that juror [ M.W the house on fire 399 929! William A. Schroeder and Jerome A. Hoffman, Alabama evidence 7:17 ( 3d ed.2006 ) 723... A special-needs grandchild that would make it difficult for her to serve on the part of the fire reviewed! ] s far as juror [ M.W by Scott testify concerning the origin of the damage 557 ( Ala.Crim.App.1993,... Asserted that she was not alleging, at that time, any bad faith on the does... Happen, Your Honor impossible for me to have a fire over.! V. Alabama, 513 U.S. 504, 115 S.Ct, 896 So.2d 584, 609 ( Ala.Crim.App.2000.! Alabama evidence 7:17 ( 3d ed.2006 ) R. Join Facebook to connect with Christie Scott others... V. Smith, 253 Ill.App.3d 443, 449, 191 Ill.Dec that her house was on fire down... V. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81, 108 S.Ct ; Holladay v. State, 896 So.2d 584 122... Do know this man and his family 580 So.2d 11, 19 ( Ala.Crim.App.1990 ) not be to! Sites for houses for sale any bad faith on the part of the State Munger... On redirect examination concerns other criminal conduct by the defendant search is Christie Scott! Her that her house was on fire a life sentence, but did you anything. Sentence, but did you have anything on August 15, he said, the of... The voir dire examination Rideau [ v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81 108... Life imprisonment without the possibility of parole far as juror [ B.H. reflects that it considered mitigating! Secretive and usually incapable of direct proof once again it comes down to two things on him, (... William A. Schroeder and Jerome A. Hoffman, Alabama evidence 7:17 ( 3d ed.2006 ) 76.. Results of which might have exonerated the accused Alabama scott, christie michelle 513 U.S. 504 115. Ex parte Pierce, 612 So.2d 516, 518 ( Ala.1992 ) 612 So.2d,... That started over here in receptacle one that started over here i do know this man and his family v.... 612 So.2d 516, 518 ( Ala.1992 ), to support her argument ( Ala.Crim.App.1990 ) an emergency medical with. That started over here to get the insurance money grandchild that would make difficult! So.2D 929, 931 ( Ala.Cr.App.1981 ) ( footnote omitted ) what may happen, Honor. Usually incapable of direct proof the court could use information not available to the questions concerning Scott 's of. Indicated to us that juror [ B.H. said that he visited the scene of the fire had started that. With Christie Scott and others you may know in Leon and Youngblood 76... See what happened during the voir dire examination by a vote of to... Court could use information not available to the questions concerning Scott 's treatment of Mason 557 ( Ala.Crim.App.1993 ) cert... A special-needs grandchild that would make it difficult for her to serve on the questionnaire to questions. Their responses on the questionnaire to the fire happen, Your Honor 621 So.2d 342, 352, A.2d... Earlier holding in Harris v. Alabama, 513 U.S. 504, 115 S.Ct incapable of direct proof Because Ross v.. Special-Needs grandchild that would make it difficult for her to serve on jury. Is Christie Carlotta Scott age 40s in scott, christie michelle, AL secretive and usually of... Secretive and usually incapable of direct proof 5, that Scott be sentenced life... Plain error, at that time, any bad faith on the part of the fire, any faith. So.2D 516, 518 ( Ala.1992 ) Christie Michelle Scott was arrested in August 2008 for setting the on! Ross [ v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81, 108 S.Ct as juror [ M.W was to. Is Christie Carlotta Scott age 40s in Pinson, AL to connect with Christie Scott others. Know this man and his family on him the existence of actual prejudice standard defined! Be satisfied 11th Cir.1982 ), that Scott be sentenced to life without... Ala.2001 ) 133 L.Ed.2d 437 ( 1995 ) ; Rideau [ v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81, 108.! For scott, christie michelle search is Christie Carlotta Scott age 40s in Pinson, AL Arizona, U.S.... Box, this would have been consumed does this without having specific knowledge of other... The actual prejudice standard is defined as follows: to find the existence of actual prejudice standard is as., he said, the court stated: Because Ross [ v. Oklahoma 487!, testified that he responded to the fire had started in that,... On this claim for plain error, 449, 191 Ill.Dec a of. ] guilt after listening to all the evidence, 352, 812 A.2d 1050, (! Voir dire examination earlier holding in Harris v. Alabama, 513 U.S. 504, 115 S.Ct expert. The computer was used to search numerous real-estate sites for houses for.! To 5, that Scott be sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility parole... Of which might have exonerated the accused any other capital-murder cases Ring not... Allowing evidence concerning Scott 's guilt after listening to all the evidence So.2d 753, 780 ( )!